NZB SEARCH 2018 CODE
Output from user script "Default" (Exit code = 0):
NZB SEARCH 2018 DOWNLOAD
SABnzbd has failed to download "URL here" SABnzbd has failed to retrieve the NZB from The error message was: URL Fetching failed Empty NZB file X.nzb I contacted them and they showed me there is nothing wrong with the NZBs themselves and said its something with SAB. I agree but does it show enough interest holding AKx of trumps and AK to seven of our own suit? It seems Michael Cornell’s jump to 5 highlights both the problem and the potential of our hand.I get this error on a fair amount of NZBs originating from NZBgeek. If partner bids 3NT, then a bid of 4 by me shows slam interest.” Pam Livingston “3 : asking for a spade stop or showing a good raise of hearts.
I am not so sure of that and neither is Pam: The implication is that 3 would be a cue-bid. If partner bids 4 I will pass but over 4 I will key card.”Ĭue or splinter, 4 should be forcing and unnatural (5-7 in the minors just does not happen, does it?!)Īndy Braithwaite “4 : hopefully a splinter agreeing hearts without a spade control.” Peter Newell “4 : cue - can’t really be natural when the opponents have usually shown diamonds - I have a good hand if partner has a spade control and some sort of club fit - with such great heart support have to start moving. A splinter in diamonds would be more descriptive but there is no guarantee of safety at the five level, especially given the bad breaks suggested by East’s two suiter. This is the only slam try for hearts I have available with this hand, 3 would be either a no trump probe or an advance cue bid. Over 4, I will use RKC and bid the slam when partner confirms that they have at least one ace.”
Over 4, I will pass as in all probability we are off at least AK. Agreeing are:īruce Anderson “4 : East has shown a good hand with spades and diamonds, so partner should read my bid as agreeing hearts and showing control in diamonds. Lots of awkward auctions happen when you don't show support immediately, but here 4 cannot be natural so we have survived and can get back on track.”Ĥ would seem to answer Patrick’s concerns. Nigel Kearney “4 : A cue bid with heart support and slam interest. Presuming that we are playing 5 card majors I would have bid 4 last time Yes, I would have liked a 4th heart, but it would make the bidding a lot easier.”Īlso bemoaning our previous action but a little more positive now is: That certainly won't help matters so I must choose a conservative 4. I can imagine partner bidding 5 with either of the two hands I quoted. However, I can't recall making this agreement with anyone. If 4 was a cue bid agreeing hearts then I would choose that. Pat Carter “4 : Qx QJ10xxx KQJ Qx will make only 10 tricks while Highlighting the same trick-taking potential differential but reaching a rather different conclusion is (welcome back. If partner has K but not A, we are overboard! However, if he has just both aces and Qxxxxx, I want to be in 7 so I must make a slam try.” Michael Cornell “3 : can only bid 3 forcing and my next bid will be 5, obviously looking for a spade control. Our spade holding is very suspect and we need to know partner can win a trick quickly in that suit while we also want to ensure we are not off two aces. There is one big problem with respect to our being in slam, well perhaps two. 2H is Michael’s style, at least 5 cards in each of spades and a minor, 9+ high card points, certainly a reasonable hand in view of the vulnerability.
0 kommentar(er)
